Econometric analysis of individuals’ preference heterogeneity: An application to the economic evaluation of uphill landscape


  • Sergio Colombo Instituto de Investigación y Formación Agraria y Pesquera (IFAPA)
  • Nick Hanley Universidad de Stirling



Heterogeneity, Latent class models, Covariance heterogeneity models, Random parametermodels, Uphill landscape


The need to account for respondents’ preference heterogeneity in stated choice models has motivated researchers to apply random parameter logit and latent class models. In this paper we compare these three alternative ways of incorporating preference heterogeneity in stated choice models and evaluate how the choice of model affects welfare estimates in a given empirical application. Finally, we discuss what criteria to follow to decide which approach is most appropriate.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sergio Colombo, Instituto de Investigación y Formación Agraria y Pesquera (IFAPA)

Dep. de Economía Agraria
IFAPA, Granada.

Nick Hanley, Universidad de Stirling

Dep. de Economía, FK9 4LA
Universidad de Stirling


Amador, F.J., Gonzales, R. y Ortuzar, J. (2005). «Preference heterogeneity and willingness to pay for travel time savings». Transportation, 32:627-647.

Ben-Akiva, M.E. y Swait, J.D. (1986). «The Akaike likelihood ratio index». Transportation Science, 20:133-136.

Bhat, C.R. (1997). «Covariance heterogeneity in nested logit models: Econometric structure and application to intercity travel». Transportation Research-B, 31:11-21.

Birol, E., Karousakis, K. y Koundouri, P. (2006). «Using choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditita wetland in Greece». Ecological Economics, 60:145.156.

Boxall, P.C. y Adamowicz, W. (2002). «Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach». Environmental and Resource Economics, 23:421-446.

Colombo, S., Hanley N. y Calatrava-Requena J. (2005). «Designing policy for reducing the off-farm effects of soil erosion using Choice Experiments». Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(1):80-96.

Colombo, S. y Hanley, N. (2008). «How can we reduce the errors from «benefits transfer? An investigation using the Choice Experiment method». Land Economics, 84:128-147.

Cumulus Consultants Ltd., Institute for European Environmental Policy and the Countryside and Countryside Research Unit (2005), Assessment of the impact of CAP reform and other key policies on upland farms and land use implications in both Severely Disadvantaged & Disadvantaged Areas of England, report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

De Shazo, R. y Fermo, G. (2002). «Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency». Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44:123–143.

Dellaert, B., Brazell J. y Louviere, J. (1999). «The effect of attribute variation on consumer choice consistency». Marketing Letters, 10(2):139-147.

Greene, W. y Hensher, D. (2003). «A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit». Transportation Research Part B, 37:681-698.

Hanemann, W. (1984). «Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiment with discrete responses». American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66:332-341.

Hanley, N., Wright, R. y Koop, G. (2002): «Modelling Recreational Demand Using Choice Experiment: Climbing in Scotland». Environmental and Resource Economics, 22:449-466.

Hanley, N., Colombo, S., Tinch, D., Black, A. y Aftab, A. (2006). «Estimating the benefits of water quality improvements under the water framework directive: are benefits transferable?». European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33:391-413.

Hensher, D., Greene, W. y Rose, J. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Johns, H., Hanley, N., Colombo, S. y Ozdemirogou, E. (2006). «Economic Valuation of Environmental Impacts in the Severely Disadvantaged Areas». Informe para el Departamento de Environment, Food and Rural Affair, Reino Unido. 182 páginas.

Kallas, Z., Gómez-Limón, J.A., Arriaza, M. y Nekhay, O. (2006). «Análisis de la demanda de bienes y servicios no comerciales procedentes de la actividad agraria: el caso del olivar de montaña». Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 6(11):49-79.

Krinsky, I. y Robb, A. (1986). «On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities». Review of Economics and Statistics, 68:715-719.

Layton, D.F. (2000). «Random coefficient models for stated preference surveys». Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40:21-36.

Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A. y Swait, J. (2000). Stated Choice Methods, Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press.

Louviere, J.J., Street, D., Carson, R., Ainslie, A., Deshazo, J., Cameron, T., Hensher, D., Kohn, R. y Marley, T. (2002). «Dissecting the random component of utility». Marketing Letters, 13(3):177-193.

Louviere, J. y Eagle, T. (2006). Confound it! That pesky little scale constant messes up . Cen- SoC Working Paper No. 06-002.

Manski, C. (1977): «The structure of random utility models». Theory and Decision, 8:229-254.

McFadden, D. (1973): «Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour». En: Zarembka, P. (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics, New York: Academic Press: 105-142.

McFadden, D. y Train K. (2000). «Mixed MNL models of discrete response». Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15:447-470.<447::AID-JAE570>3.3.CO;2-T

Personn, T.H. (2002). «Welfare calculations in models of the demand for sanitation». Applied Economics, 34(12):1509-1518.

Provencher, B. y Bishop, R. (2004). «Does accounting for preference heterogeneity improve the forecasting of a random utility model? A case study». Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48:793-810.

Revelt, D. y Train, K. (1998). «Mixed logit with repeated choices: Households’ choices of appliance efficiency level». Review of Economics and Statistics, 80:1-11.

Rigby, D. y Burton, M. (2006). «Modelling disinterest and dislike: a bounded Bayesian mixed logit model of the UK market for GM food». Environmental and Resource Economics, 33(4):485-510.

Sayadi, S., González, M.C. y Calatrava-Requena, J. (2004). «Estudio de preferencias por elementos agrarios en el paisaje mediante el método de análisis conjunto y análisis contingente: El caso de la Alpujarra granadina». Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 4(7):135-151.

Sayadi, S., González-Roa, M.C. y Calatrava-Requena, J. (2005). «Ranking versus scale rating in Conjoint Analysis: evaluating landscapes in mountainous regions in South-eastern Spain». Ecological Economics, 55:539-550.

Shen, J., Sakata, Y. y Hashimoto, Y. (2006). «A comparison between latent class model and mixed logit model for transport mode choice: evidences from two datasets of Japan». Discussion paper 06-05 Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University, Japón.

Street, D., Burgess, L. y Louviere, J. (2005). «Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments.» International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22 (4):459-470.

Swait, J. y Adamowicz, W. (2001). «Choice environment, market complexity and consumer beahviour: A theoretical and empirical approach for incorporating decision complex into models of consumer choice». Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 86(2):141-167.

Train, K. (1998). «Recreation demand models with taste differences over people». Land Economics, 74:230-239.

Train, K. (2003). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulations, Cambridge University Press.