The Plan of Equivalents. Mat-Rooming

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/vlc.2017.6953

Keywords:

functional indifference, equivalency, matrix, room, mat-building

Abstract

Attention to the mechanisms by which certain architectural configurations are able to adapt to change defines a field of interest that has only been growing since the mid-twentieth century, after overcoming the exclusive dilemma between form and function. However, the influence of strategies based on the principle of free plan is still much greater than that of other proposals that are not based on the independence between supporting structure and distributive organization. The aim of this work is the definition of a genealogy for the idea of the plan of equivalents that is proposed as an alternative model of functional indifference, establishing a connection between the logics of pre-bourgeois domestic architecture and the most recent examples of programmatic experimentation in housing. The re-interpretation of some iteration techniques of elements developed in the 60s by the most critical generation with canonical modernity, together with the analysis of their associated operative vocabulary, will allow an outline to an approach of the inhabiting patterns based on the systematic proliferation of the room as a generic piece.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Silvia Colmenares, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Profesor Ayudante Doctor

Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid.

Departamento de Proyectos Arquitectónicos

References

Ábalos&Herreros, 2G n. 22. Barcelona: Editorial Gustavo Gili, 2002.

Alexander, Christopher. “A city is not a tree”. Architectural Forum. Vol. 122 n. 1 (April 1965).

Álvarez-Lombardero, Nuria. “Mat-building. La promesa de asociación espacial”. RA, Revista de Arquitectura Vol. 12 (2010).

Bakema, Jaap. “An Emperor’s House at Split became a town for 3000 People”. Forum n. 2 (1962).

Banham, Rayner. Megastructure: Urban Futures of the Recent Past. New York: Harper and Row, 1976.

Boyer, M. Christine. “The Team X discourse: keeping the language of modern architecture alive and fresh” in Team 10. In search of a Utopia of the Present, eds. Risselada, Max and Dirk van den Heuvel. Rotterdam: NAi, 2005.

Campens, Angelique. “Radical acts of everyday life”. Domus n. 964 (December 2012).

Díaz-Moreno, C. y García Grinda E. “Océano de aire”. El Croquis n. 121-122 (2004).

Evans, Robin. “Figuras, Puertas y Pasillos” in Traducciones. Valencia: Editorial Pre-Textos, 2005.

Eyck, Aldo van. “The Child, the City and the Artist” in Aldo Van Eyck: Writings Vol 1, eds. Ligtelijn, V. and F. Strauven. Amsterdam: SUN, 2008.

Eyck, Aldo van. “Steps Toward a Configurative Discipline” in Architecture Culture 1943-1968, ed. Joan Ockman. New York, NY: Rizzoli, 1993.

Eyck, Aldo van. “Is Architecture Going to Reconcile Basic Values?” in CIAM ‘59 Otterlo, ed. Oscar Newman. Stuttgart: Kremer Verlag, 1961.

Forty, Adrian. Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture. New York: Thames & Hudson, 2000.

Geers, K. and D. van Severen. “Imágenes para 25 habitaciones: Office KGDVS”. ARQ n. 80 (2012).

Herzberger, Herman. Lessons for Students in Architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2009.

Heilmayer, Florian. Interview to Office KGDVS for Crystal Talk series by Bauznet. 30 March 2017. http:// www.baunetz.de/talk/crystal/pdf/en/talk30.pdf.

Heuvel, Dirk van den. “The Diagrams of Team 10”. Daidalos n. 74 (1999).

Lapierre, Eric. “Fondations d’un discours architectural”. Détective Public n. 4 (2013). 1 October 2013. http://www.detectivepublic.com/n4/article7.html.

Labasse, Alexandre. “Office KGDVS. The silent revelation”. L’Architecture d’aujourd’hui n. 381 (February 2011).

Le Corbusier. Précisions sur un état présent de l’architecture et de l’urbanisme. Paris: G. Cres, 1930.

Monteys, Xavier. “Plan Paralysé: revisando los cinco puntos” in Massilia 2002: anuario de estudios lecorbuserianos. Barcelona: Fundación Caja de Arquitectos, 2002.

Monteys, Xavier. Casa Collage. Un ensayo sobre la arquitectura de la casa. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2001.

Nelson, George y Henry Wright. Tomorrow’s House. A complete Guide for the Home-Builder. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1945.

Nishizawa, Ryue. “Creating Principles – Structure, Plan, Relationship, Landscape”. GA Architect n. 18 (2005).

Office KGDVS (Interview). PLOT (2012). 1 October 2013. http://www.revistaplot.com/johnstonmarklee-office-kgdvs-rotativas-05.

Office Kersten Geers David Van Severen. Micro-exhibition at BOZAR Center for Fine Arts. Brussels. Visitor’s Guide. 15 October 2013. http://www.bozar.be/file/303/download.

Oxman,R., Shadar H. and E. Belferman. “Casbah: a Brief History of a Design Concept”. Arq: Architectural Research Quarterly Vol. 6 n. 4 (2002).

Rowe, Collin. Manierismo y arquitectura moderna y otros ensayos. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 1980.

Sanaa. “Campos de juego líquidos. Fragmentos de una conversación”. El Croquis n. 121-122 (2004).

Sanaa. “Una conversación con Kazuyo Sejima y Ryue Nishizawa”. El Croquis n. 139 (2007).

Sarkis, Hassim. “The Paradoxical Promise of Flexibility” in Case: Le Corbusier’s Venice Hospital and the Mat Building Revival. Munich: Prestel, 2001.

Schneider, Tatjana and Jeremy Till. Flexible Housing. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007.

Smithson, Alison. “How to Recognize and Read Mat-Building; Mainstream Architecture as It Has Developed Towards the Mat-Building”. Architectural Design n. 9 (September 1974).

Steinmann M., et al. “Réflexions sur le logement contemporaine”. Faces n. 28 (1993).

Vidler, Anthony. “Palladio reassessed by Eissenman”. Architectural Review Vol. 232 n. 1389 (2012).

Wittkower, Rudolf. Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism. London: Warburg Institute, University of London, 1949.

Published

2017-10-24

Issue

Section

Research articles