The CAP 2020: interpretating the Communication of the European Commission, COM (2010) 672 from 18.11.2010


  • Albert Massot Martí Parlamento Europeo



CAP reform, Aids, Agricultural markets, Rural development


The purpose of this paper is to analyse the content of the European Commission’s Communication of 18th November 2010 on the future of the CAP. It discusses the key issues of interest that will be tackled during the CAP reform process and it also provides some suggestions in order to support the debate before the presentation of the legislative proposals from the Commission in 2011.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Albert Massot Martí, Parlamento Europeo

Departamento de Estudios Parlamentarios - Agricultura.


Balisacan, A.M. y Roumasset, J.A. (1987). “Public choice of economic policy: The growth of agricultural protection”. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. Bd. 123, H. 2: 232-248.

Bromley, D. (1990). “The Ideology of Efficiency: Searching for a Theory of Policy Analysis”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 19: 86-107.

Compés, R. (2010). “De la deconstrucción a la refundación: elementos para un cambio de modelo de reforma de la PAC 2013”. En García Álvarez-Coque, J.M. y Gómez-Limón J.A. (Eds.): Chequeo médico de la PAC. Eumedia y Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid.

Compés, R. y García Álvarez-Coque, J.M. (2009). La reforma de la PAC y la agricultura española. Alternativas y oportunidades para España. Fundación Alternativas, Madrid.

Cunha, A. y Swinbank, A. (2011). An Inside View of the CAP Reform Process Explaining the MacSharry, Agenda 2000, and Fischler Reforms. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Dollery, B. y Worthington, A. (1996). “The Evaluation of Public Policy: Normative Economic Theories of Government Failure”. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 7(1): 27-39.

Josling, T. y Moyer, H.W. (1991). “The Common Agricultural Policy of the European Community: A Public Choice Interpretation”. En Vaubel, R. and Willet, T.D. (Eds.): The Political Economy of International Organizations. A Public Choice Approach. Vestview Press, Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford: 286-305.

Martin, W.J. (1990). “Public Choice Theory and Australian Agricultural Policy Reform”. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 34(3): 189-211.

Rivelis, M. (2009). Why is the CAP resistant to reform? Applying Public Choice theory in the analysis of the Common Agricultural Policy, Lund University, Department Of Economics Bachelor’s Thesis.

Runge, M.C. y Myers, R.J. (1985). “Shifting Foundations of Agricultural Policy Analysis: Welfare Economics When Risk Markets are Incomplete”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67: 1010-16.

Scrimgeour, F.G. y Pasour, E.C. (1996). “A Public Choice Perspective on Agricultural Policy Reform: Implications of the New Zealand Experience”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78: 257-267.

Senior Mello, S. (1984). “An application of Public Choice Theory to the question of CAP reform”. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 11(3): 261-283.

Shaw, G.K. (1953). An introduction to the theory of macro-economic policy. Harlequin Press, Manchester.

Sosa, F. y Sosa, I. (2007). El Estado fragmentado: modelo austro-húngaro y brote de naciones en España. Trotta, Madrid.

Tangermann, S. (2011). Direct Payments in The CAP Post 2013. Note. Directorate General for Internal Policies. Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies. Agriculture and Rural Development, European Parliament.

Tinbergen, J. (1961). Política Económica, F.C.E., México.

Vaubel, R. (1994). “The public choice analysis of European integration: A survey”. European Journal of Political Economy, 10(1): 227-249.

Wallace, H. (1983). “Negotiation, Conflict, and Compromise: The Elusive Pursuit of Common Policies”. En Wallace, H., Wallace, W. and Webb, C. (Eds.): Policy Making in the European. Wiley, Chichester.

Zahrnt, V. (2011). A Guide to CAP Reform Politics: Issues, Positions and Dynamics. Ecipe, Working Paper No. 03/2011.